Action Autism
Home
Our Team
Projects
Our Impact
Stories
Get Involved
Blog
Learning
Media
Privacy Policy
Action Autism
Home
Our Team
Projects
Our Impact
Stories
Get Involved
Blog
Learning
Media
Privacy Policy
More
  • Home
  • Our Team
  • Projects
  • Our Impact
  • Stories
  • Get Involved
  • Blog
  • Learning
  • Media
  • Privacy Policy
  • Home
  • Our Team
  • Projects
  • Our Impact
  • Stories
  • Get Involved
  • Blog
  • Learning
  • Media
  • Privacy Policy

Privacy Policy

1. 🔒 Misappropriation of Intellectual Property

Legal Basis: U.S. Copyright Law (Title 17, U.S. Code)

  • The interviews published by the nonprofit are considered intellectual property owned by the organization.
  • Even if published publicly (e.g., YouTube), the content cannot be reused for personal commercial or promotional use without permission.
  • Copying the “Projects” tab layout in the app could also be considered a derivative work under copyright law.

Violation:

Title 17 USC § 106 – Exclusive rights of copyright holders
Misappropriating work for personal benefit = IP infringement

2. 📋 Conflict of Interest

Legal Basis: IRS Rules for 501(c)(3) Organizations + Common Law Fiduciary Duties

  • As a fundraising associate, he had a duty of loyalty to the nonprofit.
  • Using internal knowledge, contacts, or reputation gained through his position to benefit a personal venture is a conflict of interest.
  • If he failed to disclose the personal app or its use of org contacts/content, that’s a breach.

Violation:

IRS Form 990 Instructions: Conflict of Interest Policy
Duty of loyalty under nonprofit law and fiduciary standards

3. 🤝 Misrepresentation and False Endorsement

Legal Basis: Lanham Act (Trademark/False Endorsement Law)

  • If he used interviews or relationships formed through the nonprofit to make it appear that the nonprofit supports or endorses his app, this is false endorsement.
  • This misleads the public, especially if the interviewee was shown promoting his app immediately after being featured by your organization.

Violation:

15 U.S. Code § 1125 – False Designation of Origin (Lanham Act)

4. 📜 Violation of Organizational Policy (Internal Rules)

Legal/Contractual Basis: Employee Handbook, Volunteer Agreement, or Code of Conduct

He likely violated internal nonprofit rules such as:

  • Unauthorized use of organizational resources (interview content, contact access)
  • External project conflicts (developing a competing or confusing project)
  • Lack of transparency or failure to disclose side ventures

Even if these policies weren’t formally written, common nonprofit governance principles still apply.

Violation:

Breach of internal policy or agreement (even verbal)
Standard nonprofit ethics codes (e.g., Association of Fundraising Professionals [AFP] Code of Ethics)

Copyright © 2025 Action Autism - All Rights Reserved.

  • Stories
  • Blog
  • Learning

Powered by

This website uses cookies.

We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.

DeclineAccept